tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4260161238059581294.post789351755491656095..comments2021-06-05T01:33:22.805+01:00Comments on Advancing gingerly: UK standards fall to a new lowUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4260161238059581294.post-45349842595818852062007-09-21T10:39:00.000+01:002007-09-21T10:39:00.000+01:00Well my outrage was somewhat tongue in cheek. And ...Well my outrage was somewhat tongue in cheek. And I'd really rather that an organisation was better at the accuracy with the big stuff than the trivial. But equally, I can only view that kind of manipulation with quite a strong degree of incredulity! It just seems so petty and pointlessGingerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08330196582825230156noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4260161238059581294.post-12821428976243986332007-09-21T08:52:00.000+01:002007-09-21T08:52:00.000+01:00As Ginger said, it really doesn't matter what name...As Ginger said, it really doesn't matter what name is chosen. If the viewers choice was totally inappropriate, then maybe go for a second choice. But this is just pointless stupidity.The Cathttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06000316060040049646noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4260161238059581294.post-8432178773316828422007-09-21T07:01:00.000+01:002007-09-21T07:01:00.000+01:00The highlight for me has to be "the BBC's standard...The highlight for me has to be "<I>the BBC's standards must be as high in small-scale competitions as they are in the most major news story.</I>"<BR/><BR/>OK, the BBC are probably the most reliable news service in the UK. But that doesn't stop them reporting hearsay and rumour as news. Why should we expect higher standards on their competitions than we get on the news?Johnhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02487495921222083129noreply@blogger.com